Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I don't know how you test these, but at least against indestructible Vlads the combination {{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|a}}(QFQFSSA) deals more damage than {{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|a}}{{Elem|a}} (QFQFSAA). [[Special:Contributions/179.209.106.16|179.209.106.16]] 19:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
I don't know how you test these, but at least against indestructible Vlads the combination {{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|a}}(QFQFSSA) deals more damage than {{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|s}}{{Elem|a}}{{Elem|a}} (QFQFSAA). [[Special:Contributions/179.209.106.16|179.209.106.16]] 19:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
β | |||
β | EDIT 1 |
||
β | Although the above is also a useful combination, to yield more damage (as per the Spell Combinations page) the alternate combination would be: {{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|qf}}{{Elem|a}}{{Elem|s}} (QF-QF-QF-A-S). This is due to the damage multipliers between Steam(90/127.28/156/180{{Elem|qf}} damage.) vs Lightning(51.25/72.5/88.8/102.5{{Elem|a}} damage.) when applying to beams. 09:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |